home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1750 / 1750p044.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  70KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky
OCR: 30 F.2d 945 950 (9th Cir. 1954 Cert. denied, 348 U.S. 971. 75 S.Ct. 532. 66 L.Ed. 756 {1955} n comparison, the appropriateness of the even handed approach to interpreting Section 505 well sum marized by the decision Cohen, supra F.Supp 623 Absolutely nothing in the statute [17 U.S.C 505] ot the Iegislative history gives T courts authority distinguish between aI award af attornevs Fees to prevailing defendant and an award to prevailing plaintiff Nor am persuaded that distinction should be made in ue award because there is some need encour age plaintiffs file suit which differs in public benefit from need to encou trage det endants defend suits Copyright law5 are you intended for the benefit prospective plaintiffs. Who may be plaintiff who may De defendant doesn"t define the difference betwe ...